Masters of Health Magazine April 2021 | Page 102

One case in point is that the CDC website has just recently admitted that the wearing of masks only possibly changed the spread of the virus by about 1%. They also admit that the study they are quoting has a 5% margin of error. What that means is that masks wearing had no statistical significance in halting the spread of the virus. Yet Dr. Fauci continues to now tell us that we should be wearing two masks instead of just one.

The first article that I wrote for Masters of Health Magazine, about a year ago, was on the science of wearing masks; how they do not help and can possibly harm us with extended wearing. Now, a year later we have even more data that continues to show us the truth of that position.

https://pdmj.org/   The Science on Masks

https://omny.fm/shows/the-todd-herman-show/dr-colleen-huber-the-effectiveness-of-masks-agains

Excellent Interview with Dr. Coleen Huber on Masks  15:05

 

I live in the state of Mississippi, which has removed the mask mandate, and yet, as I go to stores, about half the people still wearing the masks. They have become so conditioned that they don’t even stop to think about why they are putting them on. I am also beginning to think, as I observe this, that maybe this whole thing wasn’t about a medical solution, but rather a political maneuver.

As I have continued to search out the facts and data associated with this crisis, I find more and more scientific voices speaking out against this genetic experiment being foisted upon the public. The signatories of The Great Barrington Declaration express, “Grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.” To date, there are 41,890 medical practitioners, 13,796 medical researchers and scientists, and 764,085 concerned citizens who have signed the declaration. Over 50,000 of these are trained scientists who are cautioning against this experiment, yet we are told to follow the science as if these cautionary voices aren’t science. How amazing is that? The website is: https://gbdeclaration.org/

America’s Frontline Doctors is another organization of doctors and medical professionals who have taken a stand to demonstrate their opposition to the current approach to the CV crisis. Their website: https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.com/mission-statement/ has over 600,000 people who have signed to join their efforts. They have doctors and scientists from around the world as members and conduct frequent conferences to address the current issues.

The Frontline Doctors have taken issue with most of the policies that have been put into place to manage this crisis because they conflict with the data and science, as well as medical practices. They have taken exception to the drugs that have been basically outlawed here in the USA, but have been proven to be very effective in other countries around the world. They have taken ex-ception to the use of masks and social distancing and have been proven to be very effective in other countries around the world. They have taken ex-ception to the use of masks and social distancing and have been very critical of the lockdown policies that have destroyed businesses and lives at an alarming rate. They have certainly taken a position against the widespread inoculation of this genetic coding that is being passed off as the way back to normalcy.

It is one thing to be alarmed at the beginning of this crisis and treat it very carefully as far as pub-lic policy goes, since we have historically been through other similar crises such as the Spanish Flu of 1918. But a year later, when we have so much data available, we should be able to have a much better response. Yet the political and social response seems to be almost more irrational than at the beginning. When do we really start listening to the scientists and doctors? When do we really pay attention to the data? When do we finally actually follow the science?