Environmental Persistence and Heritability
Terrana claims some RNA constructs may be heritable across plant generations, raising the alarm about unintentional spread across species and ecosystems. This uncontrolled gene expression mirrors historically what we have witnessed with GMOs, only magnified by a sprayable, replicable system.
A Physician’s Warning:
The fight against GMOs has been an uphill battle, with industry and regulatory agencies suppressing public awareness despite mounting and censored scientific evidence of harm.
Governmental Oversight: Why So Creased?
The EPA has already approved RNA-based applications such as GreenLight’s RNAi spray in 2024. Terrana’s RNA is more advanced: it enters the plant interior and replicates, rather than merely coating leaves like earlier RNA sprays.
Regulatory agencies have permitted early usage under experimental-use guidance, without labeling mandates, and with Pre-emption protections, shielding manufacturers from legal accountability.
What Could Go Wrong?
Danger, Will Robinson
Terrana’
Unlike GMOs, which underwent lengthy (although faulty and imperfect) regulatory reviews and must be grown from modified seeds, RNA sprays can be applied repeatedly
and directly onto crops, meaning gene expression can be continuously manipulated in the field.
This creates a moving target for a safety evaluation.
Be clear: there is no fixed genome to study, no long-term data, and no labeling for consumers. By treating plants like “
Traditional GMOs were studied and showed harms; ignored by industry and the government. Terrana’s RNA sprays are the next unretrievable experimental, untested at scale, and stunningly released under legal immunity, which makes this approach a vast, uncontrolled genetic experiment in our food system, our health, and our environment.
The effects of RNA sprays on our microbiome? Unknown!
Final Thoughts
While Big Ag and Big Tech proponents tout RNA sprays as ‘climate‑responsive’ innovations, the lack of long-term safety studies, absence of labeling, and legal immunity represent an unchecked genetic experiment. Unlike GMOs subjected to years of oversight and litigation, this new platform bypasses those meager safeguards entirely.
As a physician, I urge readers and policymakers alike to demand transparency, full labeling, independent safety testing especially assessing impacts on children’s immune and reproductive health before allowing gene-altering sprays into our food system and environment.
Approval? No.
Moratorium.