configurations? (This is true with tides and certain sea animals. Why not influence humans also?)
Let us suppose that our mind’s thoughts are frequencies of electrical energy and that they work much like the iron oxide that is used to develop the patterns on early audio tape recordings. The iron oxide does not have a choice in what it patterns, or records and I would like to propose that the human mind might work somewhat similarly.
If each thought is a frequency, let us speculate that “loving horses” might be given the mathematical label of +11. Let us also suppose that what the ancients have been teaching us about frequency is true: That we each seek to go back to zero to feel balanced.
Look at this idea as follows:
+11 +10 +9 +8 +7 +6 +5 +4 +3 +2 +1
0
-1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 -11
“0” as perfection is in the middle – with perfectly balanced negative and positive potential. (The “+” and “--“markings are simply an electrical charge measurement. It does not mean good or bad, although I think somewhere down through the ages it began to be interpreted that way.) If the thought of “loving horses” is +11, in order to be balanced, going toward “0”, you would have to choose a thought or action that would have a mathematical frequency of +10, +9, +8, and so on OR you could choose a thought that was -11 and go directly to zero in a flash.
I would like to propose that we each choose gradients in between the smallest step and the largest step and that the differences in these increments are what keep us looking for answers.
I would like to point out that I made up the frequency labels, this is just a theory. Although we do have evidence that every thought is an electrical frequency, we don’t, yet, know which frequency belongs individually to each person or thought.
What I would like to propose is that we don’t have a choice of which thoughts we think. It is much like putting two magnets close to one another. If the correct poles are aligned, they will be attracted. The magnets don’t have a choice.
I have theorized that this is also the way the human minds react. Our minds work like magnetic recordings. Our choice is only to feel comfortable or uncomfortable about our choices. It also proposes the idea that EVERYTHING YOU THINK IS REQUIRED.
If your “EVERYTHING” that you experience/think is required, how would someone close to you influence your life?
This idea might relieve a lot of guilt and strain. It would cause us to look at those who commit murder and rape in a different light. It would also give us an additional way to categorize humans. Instead of using our physical characteristics linked to physical DNA genetics, we would have families based on similar magnetic energies. I would like to call this theory Electro Magnetic Genetics. Genetics based on akin energy potentials not physical DNA attributes.
During some of our vocal frequency-based experiments we have found that some psychological states are strikingly similar in frequency even though they are strikingly dissimilar as human events.
For instance: hope and exaggeration are similar frequencies but different as human behaviors: the same goes for passion and rage; fevered praying and hostility. This would indicate that it is what we do with the frequency that we are exhibiting that makes the difference, not what the actual frequency is, as a measurement.