Masters of Health Magazine July 2022 | Page 98

What if Governments are lying to you about the dangers of viruses and the benefits of vaccines?

Government COVID-19 vaccination policies are causing  sickness and death, due to false health information provided by the government, and it is time for all health professionals and the public to do what is right for humanity and the greater good of society: protect bodily autonomy - a fundamental human right to quality of life.

That is, the right to decide what substances are injected into our own bodies. Vaccines have been sold to the public and doctors on deceptive information and we have now lost trust in our medical profession. They are creating death and sickness in the community with ‘vaccines’/drugs that are promoted to doctors on false health information. This is because doctors’ knowledge is influenced by the pharmaceutical companies that fund their education (Ch 6 of my PhD Thesis).

The adverse events to drugs/vaccines come out weeks, months and years after the injections and this is not reported by doctors or discussed by the mainstream media. This is revealed in the 

New Documentary Shines a Light on Vaccine Injury (UK Parliament) and also in this interview describing the experiences of  vaccine injury in a family in WA. It also reveals the mistreatment of these patients by the medical system.

COVID-19 Global ‘Vaccination’ Programs

In all countries hospitalisations and deaths have increased since 2021 when a new untested gene-technology was promoted to the public as a ‘vaccine’ against COVID-19 disease. This was a Phase 3 Clinical Trial – an experiment  on the population.

This experimentation on the population was justified by governments falsely claiming there was a new virus that would harm every person that was exposed to it. A claim that was based on mathematical models not real empirical data and this has now been demonstrated to be false. 

Yet this increase in sickness and death in all age-groups

 in 2021 (as opposed to 2020 where deaths were just in the elderly with co-morbidity) has been attributed by the government to COVID19 disease itself, even though there is a direct  dose-response relationship 

between the COVID-19 ‘vaccination’ rates in 2021-22 and the increased death and hospitalisation rates. 

Here are the  Australian statistics.  And here is a summary article showing how the deaths and hospitalisations rose with the  'vaccination' rate from February 2021-22 - National Score Card Fail.

How can it be a ‘vaccine’ when governments admit that  it does not prevent transmission  of the disease in the community, and it is not stopping people dying from COVID-19 disease? The claim that it ‘reduces the symptoms’, is not supported by any evidence particularly as vaccinated people are still dying from this disease, and this criterion makes it a drug not a vaccine.

So, how are governments being permitted to attribute these hospitalisations and deaths to COVID-19 disease when most of these patients with 'the disease' (based on a test not symptoms) have been ‘vaccinated’ and 'the disease' may be a result of adverse health outcomes to the vaccine? This is because diagnosis of the disease is being based on a test and not on disease symptoms.

Health departments are misusing the  Rapid Antigen Test  (Lateral Flow Test) and insisting that every person that is admitted or treated at a hospital – with or without flu-like symptoms - must have a rapid antigen test.

These tests are not licensed diagnostic tools on their own and there is no proof that the identified 'virus' is the cause of the disease. The correct use of these tests is to assist 

in diagnosis when someone presents with disease symptoms for flu-like illness. 

Yet hospitals are using these tests for admission to hospital for all patients, with or without flu-like illness. All positive tests are being labelled as 'cases of COVID-19 disease.' This is fraudulent and it is hiding the number of vaccinated patients that are being admitted to hospital with adverse events to the vaccine, but are testing positive to the rapid antigen test.

The identification of a virus in a person when no disease symptoms are present is falsely being labelled a ‘case’ of disease. These should be called sub-clinical infections (

or asymptomaticinfections) and they are not a risk to the community.

A sub-clinical infection means the natural immune system is functioning properly to prevent the symptoms and this will create long-term immunity for the individual and herd immunity in the community.

The pharmaceutical companies are using pseudoscience to falsely claim that the identification of a 'virus' makes you a risk to the community and this is to convince you that we need drugs called ‘vaccines’ to control infectious diseases. Vaccines were only a secondary measure brought in after the risk of death and hospitalisation 

was removed from most cases of infectious diseases in developed countries. Hence, they have always been voluntary.

This is the flaw in the alleged pandemic of 2020 that was based on ‘cases’ of disease (not hospitalisations or deaths) found in healthy people (no symptoms)

 due to the misuse and misinterpretation of a test used to screen for just one of many viruses/bacteria/non-infectious agents that cause “flu-like” illness.

The identification of viruses in healthy people is not a useful criterion for predicting health outcomes and it is not proof of causality. Pharmaceutical companies are now influencing medical professionals and governments with this false science on the screening of healthy people for viruses.

If we stop this screening, we will stop the appearance of a ‘pandemic’ that has been based on changes to definitions to suit the vaccination agenda: a goal that is profitable and can be used to monitor and control populations.