A senior research scientist with extensive knowledge in the regulation of drugs, Dr. Saeed Qureshi, made the following comment about the many COVID19 vaccines being developed, in his article titled ‘Should FDA and other authorities approve the SARS-Cov-2/COVID-19 vaccines? – A scien-tific perspective.’:
‘Arguably, there appears to be no need, at least on an urgent basis, for developing a vaccine or any other new therapies for the illness showing mild flu-like symptoms, which could be handled with already developed and available medications. Clinical trials have been conducted without scientifi-cally valid study designs based on vague endpoints, and invalid analytical (PCR) tests that ought to produce useless conclusions and products.’
An analysis of the end-points and main issues with the clinical trials of Pfizer’s COVID19 vaccine.
In Australia, this COVID-19 vaccine will be one of many vaccines that are now used coercively to deprive Australians of their right to participate fully in society. There are 12+ vaccines that have already been mandated in coercive policies for children as well as for adult employment and wel-fare benefits from government programs. These can be expected to be added to the adult e-health card for mandatory use in the near future.
These coercive policies are a crime against the population due to the known serious adverse health outcomes (and death) that occur after many people are vaccinated. Our genetics pre-dispose us to many chronic illnesses, and these illnesses have been increasing significantly in the population in direct correlation to the increased use of vaccines for decades.
Whilst the government claims ‘correlation does not prove causation’ it is still incumbent on the government to use evidence-based medicine in the design of health policies. Dismissing this evi-dence as ‘a coincidence’ is not evidence-based medicine, and it is a crime against the people be-cause it will result in significant harm/death to an unknown number of people.